Skip to content

OURO

Putters engineered around how players see.

Research-driven  ·  Machined  ·  Player-focused

01Philosophy

Aiming starts before the stroke.

Aiming starts before the putter moves. Published aim-study literature suggests that misaim of a degree or more at address is common among golfers — context for the problem, not an OURO result. OURO starts with how a player sees, aims, and sets up.

We don’t design putters to look right.
We design around how a player sees, aims, and sets up.

Player-FocusedBegin with the human

Eye dominance, parallax, visual illusions at address — the player's perception is the first engineering constraint, not an afterthought. Every sightline, contour, and contrast decision starts with how a golfer's vision actually works, and will be tested on golfers, not just in CAD.

EngineeredMeasured, not guessed

Aim studies in degrees, acoustic signatures in hertz, tolerances in microns — the intent is for every performance claim we make to be supported by measurement, not asserted from opinion.

CraftedHonor the game

Golf has carried its craft for six centuries — from hand-forged heads to single-setup CNC milling. We hold both ends of that lineage: modern precision manufacturing executed with the patience and finish of the old workshop bench.

02Engineering

Treat aim as a tolerance. Treat feel as a frequency.

We treat perception like any other engineering domain — with numbers. These are some of the measurements our current research and design studies are built on.

±0.5°
Approximate ideal start-line window for a straight 12-foot putt
Geometric calculation from regulation ball and hole dimensions
65%
Golfers in TaylorMade's MAT-T player data who failed to square the putter face to the target from 12 feet
TaylorMade MAT-T study, thousands of putting strokes, 2011
80%
Relative importance of face angle at impact to stroke-direction consistency among elite golfers
Karlsen, Smith & Nilsson, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2008 — 71 golfers, 1,301 putts
2–4 kHz
Spectral-peak range associated with ball compression in one putting-impact study
Barrass, Roberts & Jones, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2006

Sightlines built to be tested. A screening study of head geometry alone — no sightline present — found that wing forward-sweep angle biases a golfer’s static aim by a measurable margin. Those results now inform 001’s CAD direction and starting geometry, which remains subject to prototype evaluation, design-for-manufacture, sightline testing, and further validation. Next, a controlled aim study of candidate sightline systems on that starting geometry: face angle measured in degrees across real golfers, compared against benchmark putters. Whether the alignment system improves static aim is a planned test question, not a settled result.

Sound as a design variable. Impact sound and post-impact vibration are believed to be major contributors to perceived feel. We plan to measure each prototype’s acoustic signature — spectrum, loudness, decay — with calibrated instrumentation, then shape it through geometry and milling rather than description. The goal: a sound that reflects the strike rather than one tuned to flatter it.

03Current build
Prototype — in the loopPrototype 001

OURO 001

The first revolution of the loop.

A compact mallet built around the player's sightline. The plan is for every alignment feature on 001 to go through a controlled aim study before it ships — face angle measured in degrees, across real golfers, compared against benchmark putters. This page updates as the data arrives.

OURO 001 — CAD render of the compact mallet head in raw carbon steel, three-quarter view, with the brass-filled OURO mark on the plumber's neck
05Follow the build

Prototype 001 is in the loop.

Follow the engineering journal — studies, machining, failures and all — and be first in line when it’s ready.

No spam. Just the build.